Composite Water Management Index-NITI Aayog
- Rajasthan Tops in incremental change in index (Base Year-2016)
According to a Composite Water Management Index developed by NITI Aayog, Gujarat topped among states in efficiency of water management in 2016-17, followed by Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra.
While the country is in the throes of the “worst water crisis in its history”, water-scarce states are more efficient than others in managing the resource. According to a Composite Water Management Index developed by NITI Aayog, Gujarat topped among states in efficiency of water management in 2016-17, followed by Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and Maharashtra.
However, among the “low performers” are the populous northern states including Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Rajasthan, which are home to over 600 million people or 50% of the country’s population. “These (low-performer) states also account for 20-30% of India’s agricultural output. Given the combination of rapidly declining groundwater levels and limited policy action, this is also likely to be a significant food security risk for the country going forward,” the think tank said.
- The water index scores for FY17 vary from 76 (Gujarat) to 26 (Meghalaya), with the median score being about 49 for non-Himalayan states and about 31 for others.
- Worryingly, 60% of states (14 out of 24) have achieved scores below 50 and have been classified as low performers.
By 2030, the country’s water demand is projected to be twice the current available supply, implying severe water scarcity for hundreds of millions of people and an eventual ~6% loss in the country’s GDP, it said.
Among northeastern and Himalayan states, Tripura has been adjudged No. 1 in effective water management in FY17 followed by Himachal Pradesh, Sikkim and Assam.
In terms of incremental change in index (over the FY16 base), Rajasthan was the top performer among non-Himalayan states and Tripura among the other states.
The index comprises nine broad sectors with 28 different indicators covering various aspects of groundwater, restoration of water bodies, irrigation, farm practices, drinking water, policy and governance. With data collected from multiple national and state stakeholders and a robust third-party data validation process, it has FY16 as the base year. It is reckoned that the index would be useful annual tool to assess and improve the performance in efficient management of water resources.