Skip to content
Doctrine of Lapse
- According to the Hindu Law, one can adopt a son in case of no male heir to inherit the property.
- The question arose whether a Hindu ruler, holding his state subordinate to the paramount power, could adopt a son to succeed his kingdom.
- It was customary for a ruler without a natural heir to ask the British Government whether he could adopt a son to succeed him
- According to Dalhousie, if such permission was refused by the British, the state would “lapse” and thereby become part of the British India
- Dalhousie maintained that there was a difference in principle between the right to inherit private property and the right to govern.
- This principle was called the Doctrine of Lapse.
- The Doctrine of Lapse was applied by Dalhousie to Satara and it was annexed in 1848.
- Jhansi and Nagpur were annexed in 1854
- As a result of these annexations, a large part of the Central Provinces came under the British rule.
- Although the Doctrine of Lapse cannot be regarded as illegal, its application by Dalhousie was disliked by Indian princes.
- After the Mutiny of 1857, the doctrine of lapse was withdrawn.